Slide1
About this Entry
Posted by: SalmonMe

Visit SalmonMe's Xanga Site

Original: 9/5/2007 9:39 PM
Views: 2812
Comments: 12
eProps: 10

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site

Tags


Wednesday, September 05, 2007

What Can a Two Year Old Learn?

 

 

The Carnival of Homeschooling is up at

Consent of the Governed! This post is my entry :)

 

What 2's Can Do!

PICT2774

In two months, I will "graduate" my third two-year-old. We won't have another two year old until a year and a half from now. I'm by no means old yet, but it's funny how my memory is already not what it used to be. They say you lose a quarter of your brain functioning each time you have a baby. Hmmm. Sounds like I'm in trouble ;) I find myself trying to remember when so and so did this or that and when we started such and such. Thankfully, I have written down quite a bit. It's sort of here, there, and everywhere, though. You would think I'd have a quick answer for younger friends who ask, for instance, when our children could sing the ABC song, but my answer isn't often very helpful. "I don't remember".

So, just as much for my own good as for anyone else who might be interested in what a two year can do, here is what I've written down over the last 3 two year olds :)

PICT0085 First, and not least, two years old can put forth a mighty (note Shug at right) effort in real life learning. By that I mean, they are ready to learn about anything and everything whenever you are ready to let them at it. Alphabets, counting, and scribbling aside, I am convinced that two-year-olds learn the most from lots of great experiences and lots of great books. Charlotte Mason said all educational stimuli boiled down to two broad categories: books and things. It's no different for the littles. Give them good books and a rich, wide variety of experiences with things and their young minds will have a literal feast! Dr. Ruth Beechick in her fabulous book, The 3 R's, sites studies that show the dramatic gains to be had from a wide-range learning base in the younger years. Children who play in the mud, learn about thermometers while they play outside, watch ice melt, etc. are better readers by the time they reach third grade than children who begin phonics instruction early, but have more limited exposure to real life things. This doesn't mean you can't teach even a toddler a little in the way of formal instruction, but it does mean that skill-teaching should never get in the way of a rich and varied experience.

DSC_5270 - sending For our little ones, this "varied experience" has increasingly included time outdoors. When my oldest was a toddler, we lived in a suburb of Washington, D.C. in a townhouse with a teeny, weeny backyard and a busy parking lot in the front. Not conducive to outdoor play, especially considering that traffic could easily make a trip to the park a 45 minute drive. Ugh. There are some things I miss about Virginia (mostly people), but nothing short of Divine calling could get me to go back. I mention this to point out that there are different circumstances for each family, but we can get creative :) Even a tiny townhouse yard can be used to grow flowers or vegetables from seed and to watch birds and ants. We've been able to be outside far more easily, though, since we've moved to Ohio, and I'm sure my children are better off for it. It might sound weird, but I get absolutely tickled when my girly little two and a half year old sticks an empty cicada shell on her shirt like its jewelry. Why? Because I'm glad she's considering creation as something to learn from and not something to scream at and drop. Cicadas fall into the category of educational "things". Now, lest I make myself sound all high and mighty, there are a few things out there that even Mama has a hard time keeping in her hands. I was pretty creeped out when Shug held a massive (and I mean massive) cecropia moth caterpillar at the butterfly house this summer. Wooee. It's my goal to hold one next year, though. If she can do it....

PICT2224

But, back to two year olds.  

In a home where the children are being included in much of daily life, are hearing quality books read on a regular basis, and are exposed to a wide variety of knowledge, there is no reason to hold back giving them a little teaching. When I first began looking through preschool options for my oldest, I was shocked to learn that many programs teach colors and shapes in preschool. Does that mean, then, that there are more than a few four year olds going through life with no knowledge of "red" or "green"?! That seems awfully old to me to see a group of blue, purple, orange, and red blocks as merely "blocks" and not distinctly separate groups. Do you see how just DSC_5450a little formal knowledge of colors can impact the way a growing child's mind is sorting and storing information in his everyday life? I want to make it clear that I do not advocate pushing a two year old to learn anything. I also want to make it clear, though, that - for most children - beginning readiness learning can happen naturally, easily, and without that nasty pushing. At least they can learn their colors before they're four.

But, two is a long way off from four. If you're wondering "why start so young?" or "what's the point?" my answer is mainly what I've just mentioned. Children with even a little of this categorizing knowledge can look at the world differently than those without it. Four summers ago, when SweetP was still shy of 3 years old, she saw a large windmill in Kansas. She called it a "spinning Y". She couldn't have made that connection or articulated her thought without an understanding of what "Y" looked like. A few minutes playing with Mama and some magnets each day helped her mind organize new information in a meaningful way. I would offer another reason; when school really begins in earnest, the child isn't bogged down with having to learn the basics and the content all at once. A little time gently invested in the years before age 6 can really make the transition into school work much easier for the child. The four year old taught early (and gently) is learning to read, not learning her colors, in preschool. Then, when her first full year of school begins at around age 6 there is not the sense that she is plunging into everything all at once. This is the common practice in many of the more elite, private schools in the U.S. More on that later...

Here's a brief list of things we have gently and naturally taught the three older children in the months between their second and third birthdays:

1) Sing the ABC song. Later in the year, to say it without the musical tune.

2) "Count" aloud up to 15 or so (we often use real objects along with the counting. Mama points.)

3) Recognize capital letters (mainly done through games with magnets on the fridge).

4) Memorize name, phone number, and address (for safety reasons)

5) Play rhyming games (Mama says "well", child says "fell!" - they get excited, lol)

6) Scribble and doodle a LOT! (begin making circles, adding eyes, smiles, legs, arms).

7) Begin to learn some everyday Spanish words and/or American Sign Language

8) Maybe touch on the concept of left and right

9) Recognize numbers 1-5

PICT2497 I should note that colors, shapes, and basic opposites have all been learned before age two. We have some great puzzles by Melissa & Doug that have been wonderful for teaching colors and shapes. We're also often pointing out colors, shapes, new words, etc. while we read aloud to the little ones. I'll also mention that I consider play-doh, painting, making cookies, pasting, and similar learning activities to fall within the category of "real life learning". I know, play-doh is a stretch, but great fun if you can keep it out of their mouths ;) The children never know Mama has a list of things she's working on with them. They don't realize I'm trying to teach them their shapes. They know we play games and I talk to them. There should not be a "perfomance" element to the learning.

That's it!

I stress that everything must be approached in a very relaxed way. Learning at this age should never, ever be a disipline issue. Someone will say, "But I know my son knows his colors. He's just refusing to tell me". Well, I'd say quit asking him. Quit giving him the opportuity to refuse. Just let him be for a little while. Read books, play outside. You can still point out colors casually. "Here, honey, you can have the red cup today". There's no need to drill a toddler. In fact, I would guess that most toddlers would resist much drill - or become emotionally upset by the pressure. Young children pick up quite a lot just through conversation. No conflict necessary.

Someone else will say, "Wait a minute, Miss Charlotte Mason Devotee, I've read in some of your others posts that Charlotte Mason wanted mothers to hold off on formal learning until age 6". That's completely accurate. Charlotte Mason wanted formal schooling to begin no earlier than age six. The key here is found in the word "formal". CM advocated informal learning before the school years. In Volume One, Miss Mason holds Susanna Wesley up as a model for the teaching mother and quotes extensively from Mrs. Wesley's writings. In the Wesley home, reading instruction began with great ceremony on the child's fifth birthday. In other words, before age 6. Also, Miss Mason goes on to say that learning to read is rarely a strain on the child's brain when it is taught properly:

"Many persons consider that to learn to read a language so full of anomalies and difficulties as our own is a task which should not be imposed too soon on the childish mind. But, as a matter of fact, few of us can recollect how or when we learned to read: for all we know, it came by nature, like the art of running; and not only so, but mothers of the educated classes do not know how their children learned to read. 'Oh, he taught himself,' is all the account his mother can give of little Dick's proficiency. Whereby it is plain, that this notion of the extreme difficulty of learning to read is begotten by the elders rather than by the children" (pg. 200).

As for the very little ones, Miss Mason writes of the learning they will do when given the right materials:

"Let the child alone, and he will learn the alphabet for himself: but few mothers can resist the pleasure of teaching it; and there is no reason why they should, for this kind of learning is no more than play to the child, and if the alphabet be taught to the little student, his appreciation of both form and sound will be cultivated. When should he begin? Whenever his box of letters begins to interest him. The baby of two will often be able to name half a dozen letters; and there is nothing against it so long as the finding and naming of letters is a game to him. But he must not be urged, required to show off, teased to find letters when his heart is set on some other play" (pg. 203).

May the Lord bless you as you enjoy precious moments spent discovering & learning with your two year old! It's true, we are learning right along with them :)

 

Jacci

 

home

 

 Posted 9/5/2007 9:39 PM - 2812 Views - 10 eProps - 12 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

12 Comments

Visit Beavercreekbirdlady's Xanga Site!

I also used to wonder why preschools taught things so late. I was even very disappointed with some of the homeschool materials supposedly made for kindergarten and first grade science. They were well below the level that would have been useful. This was back when most homeschool materials were really made for Christian classroom settings.

I think the answer is that in a group setting, they have to start at the lowest level of anyone in the class, because that child is the one who will have the hardest time adapting to classroom life. This includes even children with undiagnosed learning disabilities. Also, remember that preschool used to be unusual. Only kids who seemed to be having trouble would go to preschool. I and all my friends started school in kindergarten.

Also, there is a difference between recognizing a triangle and being able to produce one. For my kids, that was much harder, and that's a lot of what we did in home "preschool". I still have some very wobbly triangles that Phoebe drew. :) So preschool was more about coordination. We didn't do preschool in a formal way at all. It certainly wasn't tightly scheduled. What we did depended on the weather.

I don't know if this sheds any light on anything or not. But twos and threes are a fun age. I'm glad you're taking time to enjoy those months.

Posted 8/26/2007 10:23 PM by Beavercreekbirdlady - reply

Visit JonandEsther's Xanga Site!
GREAT POST!! I get excited when you post stuff like this. Ava will be two in a couple months and I'm loving how much her little brain is picking up. It's funny how some things have come easily...she can count to 10, sings a decent version of Twinkle, Twinkle and ABC's, and knows a few opposites, but color and shape recognition are a challenge. She knows the names of several shapes and colors, but almost always guesses wrong. It's so cute that she's trying though-- I know one day it'll come! She'll sometimes ask me "Mommy, blue?" when she sees a picture, and that lets me know that she's getting the idea of colors even if she doesn't match up the names quite yet. We have a Melissa and Doug shapes puzzle and when I say "Where does the blue circle go?" she can point to the right spot for me to lay it down, but when she's doing it herself it takes two or three tries. Maybe it's too many steps to process at once.
All I know is it makes me soooo happy when she's laying on her belly looking at a book, or when she's fascinated by pouring water into cups or clinking coins into a jar. LOVE IT!! :) Thanks for a neat post. The Ruth Beechick info made me smile. It takes the pressure off of trying to create a little genius and just get out there and PLAY!
Posted 8/26/2007 11:07 PM by JonandEsther - reply

Visit SalmonMe's Xanga Site!

Thanks for the comments :) Good to see you on Xanga again, Carla!

Esther, when I taught the girls their colors and shapes, I did not teach both concepts at the same time. I'm not sure that this matters, this is only an "it seems to me" observation. If we try to put ourselves in an untaught toddler's place, we have to get all notions of shapes and colors out of our brains. We have to try to imagine that we do not even have a concept of shape or color. Now, if you can imagine that, now imagine someone pointing at something and saying "blue circle". Remember, you have no concept of color or shape, let alone a specific color or shape. "Shape" and "color" are abstracts. "Blue" might actually mean a shape in her mind. "Green" might mean a position on the puzzle board in her mind. Do you see how that might be confusing?

It seems to me (wink) that teaching colors first makes good sense. Colors can be taught with items the child already knows. For instance, "blue ball" and "red ball" help the child see that only "red" and "blue" are different - "ball" is the same in both examples. The words "red" and "blue" must have to do with the difference between them. Now her first understanding of color as a concept begins. It's even better if the item is exactly the same in every respect *except* color. Identical balls of different colors, identical legos, etc.

I need to keep this short - it's late :) But, another way is also to show items that have nothing in common *except* the color. I remember laying half a dozen yellow toys on a sheet of yellow construction paper and saying, "All these things are yellow. Yellow duck. Yellow crayon. Yellow block. Yellow paper. Yellow." We played around with the idea of colors for a little while before moving on to shapes. I tried to stick to pure colors at first. No muddy greens or rose reds. We also usually did no more than two colors at a time. Once the child seemed to "get" those colors, we did the others. She'll get the concept after the first two, and the rest are learned really quickly :) Except maybe gray - all my girls had a little trouble with gray ;)

Posted 8/26/2007 11:31 PM by SalmonMe - reply

Visit SalmonMe's Xanga Site!
Wanted to say that "older" kids can probably learn shapes and colors at one time. But, for children under 3, this seems best to me. The first two girls learned their colors before 18 months when taught this way. Punkin took longer - she was right at two years old.
Posted 8/26/2007 11:40 PM by SalmonMe - reply

Visit JonandEsther's Xanga Site!
Makes total sense! I'd thought that before...saying the two concepts together like "yellow circle" or "blue square" was not really the smartest thing to do. I'll try focusing on one concept instead. Thanks!!
Posted 8/27/2007 9:52 AM by JonandEsther - reply

Visit amandabky's Xanga Site!

**hi Jacci!**

Beautiful blog...very fancified!  It's very hot here as well.  I'm SO ready for Fall. 

Posted 8/28/2007 12:16 AM by amandabky Xanga True Member - reply

Thanks for this great post! I am seeing similar things happening with my two- and three-year olds, and sometimes I have worried that I'm violating the No Formal Learning Before Six rule because they've learned so much, but we're not having lessons, we're just playing and read books and talking about things. They love knowing the names of everything.
Posted 9/4/2007 9:59 AM by Queen of Carrots (site) - reply

Our 2 year old knows most of his letter sounds and letter names but not any colors yet...he knows all the color names and can sort by color (we tested him, wondering if he was color blind or confused!)

Learning the letter sounds improved his speech dramatically. I think hearing the speech sound in isolation really helped him. Our daughter learned her letter sounds by age two, but she was already speaking very clearly so we didn't notice a difference.
Posted 9/4/2007 10:52 PM by Elizabeth B (site) - reply

When my daughter was a little over a year old, we noticed her associating colors. We had friends who had a dog and a cat, both black and both "puppy" (to my daughter). I didn't think anything of it until she saw a black shirt and called it "puppy". We got the dog and the cat and showed her "black puppy", "black kitty" and "black shirt". You could see the light go on behind her eyes and for weeks after that, she would drag me around the house saying "what's that?" and I had to name the object and the color. She wasn't more than a year and a half before she was able to tell me. Then she starting coming to me with a handful of crayons and ask me "show me colors, mama" and so I would have to quiz her on colors.

Going on a tangent, after a while, I got bored with the game, so I picked up a crayon and wrote her name on a piece of paper and we talked about the letters. Again, the light went on and once she knew the letters of her name it became "mama, show me ________ " with the blank being anything she could think of. She didn't have much interest at that point in trying to make the letters herself, but she loved having me write out the names of things and people in her world. I learned to introduce concepts well before I think they're ready for them. If they're not interested, no big thing, we drop it for the moment. When they are, watch out, because they're going to take off.
Posted 9/5/2007 7:03 AM by Sarah - reply

Visit SalmonMe's Xanga Site!
Thanks for the comments, ladies :) I was in a parent-teacher store the other day and a teacher's aid was explaining the use of the term "enrichment" in the public school system. She said something like the following: "So, basically, if a child is in kindergarten enrichment when he's preschool age the idea is to get him ready for kindergarten early. The preschoolers in kindergarten enrichment are learning their letters and stuff like that before they even get to kindergarten - which is just crazy". Oh, yes. Crazy. It's just crazy to have a 4yo on such an accelerated path. I mean, knowing your letters before kindergarten? That's just over the top ;)
Posted 9/5/2007 9:37 PM by SalmonMe - reply

Visit sososunny's Xanga Site!

A wonderful post...

and my kids are crazy about Cicadas!

Posted 9/13/2007 3:40 PM by sososunny - reply

Visit sweetpea1146's Xanga Site!

I have figured out a wonderful way to teach colors. Christmas lights. Maybe it just so happened that Christmas came at the same time he was ready and interested but I was very surprised at how well he picked up colors by the lights. We would wake up every morning and he was already excited to see the tree, so we would sit down for a long time in the morning saying all the colors. throughout the day we would go and sit by the tree for hours everyday. I would have to say it only took one or two days and he was well under two years old. Hope that helps!!!

Posted 2/24/2008 1:01 AM by sweetpea1146 - reply


Choose Identity
(?)
 
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 
Profile Pic:
Default  |  Choose »  (?)



Back to SalmonMe's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in SalmonMe's local time zone:
GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)